Podcast &Video clip at the bottom of the page

Abstract
This paper seeks to critically reconsider certain epistemological foundations of science and metaphysics. Drawing upon Elahi's ontological vision, the principle of  “the non-equivalence of total energy to the sum of its parts” is introduced as a theoretical basis for formulating a new framework at the intersection of physics, biology, and ontology. This principle posits that complex systems are not merely the sum of their components but embody emergent qualities that transcend them. The proposed theory aims to lay the groundwork for a deeper synthesis between academic science and modern metaphysics, potentially transforming our understanding of the structure of existential reality.

At the Research Institute Andishe Online Germany (AOG), we believe:

„Within the next two decades, a new order will dominate the planet Earth. One of the defining characteristics of this new order will be fundamental transformations across all scientific domains. Currently, we are merely establishing the preliminary frameworks.”

The present paper has been published in English, Persian, French, German, Spanish, and Arabic.

Preface

As is well known among enthusiasts of the history of science, in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, a new scientific field gradually emerged, which came to be known as quantum mechanics¹. The foundation of this discipline can be traced to Max Planck’s² pioneering work on the quantization of electromagnetic radiation emitted by black bodies. It appears that Planck was the first in the modern era to use the term "quantum" to denote a discrete, very small unit or packet.

Following Planck’s research, Werner Heisenberg³ formulated the Uncertainty Principle⁴ in 1927. Owing to this and other significant contributions, he came to be recognized as the father of quantum mechanics. Around the same time, a series of groundbreaking scientific developments signaled the decline of Cartesian–Newtonian thinking⁵. For instance, Albert Einstein⁶ published a paper arguing that Newtonian equations are valid only under limited conditions⁷. Roughly during this same period, Max Born⁸, Werner Heisenberg, and Pascual Jordan⁹ developed matrix mechanics¹⁰. In 1926, Erwin Schrödinger¹¹ introduced his “formulation of quantum mechanics”, known as the “wave equation”. That same year, John Hasbrouck Van Vleck¹² published his influential book Quantum Principles and Line Spectra¹³. Around this time, many other prominent scientists also began theorizing about a new paradigm that rapidly came to be known as “quantum mechanics.”

All of the developments that led to the emergence of quantum mechanics—whether mathematical formulations and calculations, some of which have been met with skepticism due to yielding infinite¹⁴ or non-physical results, or philosophical and probabilistic interpretations such as Schrödinger’s cat¹⁵ paradox and other approaches that Albert Einstein famously referred to as the idealism of physicists¹⁶—collectively conveyed a profound message. That message was clear: the era of scientific thinking rooted in the rigid, one-dimensional Newtonian–Cartesian worldview had come to an end. It was now imperative to approach phenomena through a new lens and from fundamentally different perspectives.

A Brief Overview of Master Elahi’s Ontology

It has now been nearly a century since the emergence of Heisenbergian quantum thought, and yet, as Einstein lamented,

“It has not brought us even a step closer to the mystery of the Old One.  [Note: Here, “the Old One” refers to Einstein’s metaphorical reference to the divine or the ultimate mystery of the universe.]”

Like many other scientific disciplines, quantum mechanics has ultimately demonstrated its inability to explain the origin of the universe¹⁷.

In such a context, the need has long been felt for a new framework—one that opens a different window through which to observe and reinterpret the forces shaping the fabric of existence. With the advent of integrative sciences¹⁸ at the Research Institute Andishe Online Germany (AOG)—rooted in the ontological teachings of Ostad Nourali Elahi¹⁹—this moment has arrived. It is time to move beyond the Heisenbergian-quantum paradigm and redefine the boundaries of knowledge.

A review of the articles published so far in the Integrative Sciences section of our Research Institute, AOG, suggests that a significant shift in scientific perspective is already in motion—one that is increasingly acknowledged by both experts and discerning observers.

No branch of mainstream academic science—including quantum mechanics, particle physics, or biology—has fully addressed the relationship between the whole and its parts. These disciplines remain largely constrained by Cartesian-Newtonian frameworks.

Nearly fifteen years ago, while compiling my handwritten research notes—collected over many prior years—I revisited one of my early papers on this very issue. By designing several graphics and formulating its core principles mathematically, I eventually articulated my findings as a scientific inequality. On April 5, 2019, I published this formulation—under the title Phase Two: Analysis of the Inorganic Stage²⁰ (Mineral Stage)—in the Integrative Sciences section of AOG. However, I deliberately refrained from explaining the theory at that time. In order to interpret this concept appropriately, it was first necessary to extract, analyze, and publish foundational ontological principles derived from Ostad Elahi’s teachings—principles that would serve as an explanatory context. A defining example of this is as follows:

• Does matter also possess a quantum dimension²¹? If so, how should it be defined and described in a way that removes it from the realm of superstition and pseudoscience, and places it firmly within the framework of academically credible science?
• It was necessary to propose a deeper and more refined definition of the magnetic field²², one that goes beyond the conventional understanding currently taught in traditional academic institutions such as universities.
• Subatomic particles²³, including fermions and antifermions, needed to be re-examined through a different lens—specifically, through the ontological framework introduced by Master Elahi—in order to facilitate a better understanding of their behaviors and interactions, which ultimately lead to the cohesion of matter.
• It was essential to explain the two primary sources of energy²⁴, from which all other forms of energy—across the multiverse(s)²⁵—are nourished.
• The full spectrum of intelligence networks²⁶, from the simplest to the most complex forms, had to be analyzed from a bold, novel, and somewhat revolutionary perspective, and made accessible to researchers.
• And, of course, dozens of additional foundational topics had to be addressed in preparation for the formulation of theories such as the Quantomagnetics Theory²⁷ and the present theory introduced in this research paper.

At this point, it is important to recognize that for such theories to attain global scientific legitimacy, complementary practical research within modern laboratories of academic institutions is essential.
Therefore, we warmly invite all researchers working in relevant fields at leading universities around the world to collaborate with us in expanding this newly opened window toward a novel scientific horizon.

The Principle of the Non-Equivalence Between Total Energy and the Sum of Its Components
This study proposes that the time has come to present this theory, developed through the analysis of Ostad Elahi’s ontology at the Research Institute AOG, as referenced above.

I consider this to be among the most critical scientific and academic issues, as it plays a fundamental role in explaining the quantum dimension of matter—from the structure of a simple atom to that of a highly complex being such as a human. Moreover, it offers insights that unveil some of the mysteries of creation itself.

According to this principle:
“In every biological system, the total energy of the whole is always greater than the sum of the energies of its constituent parts. This difference gradually increases over time.”

Note 1:
This theory defines energy as encompassing both motivational energy and information. Since this information is stored as magnetic codes in specialized databases within the quantum dimension of matter, the entire system is regarded as an energy system, albeit one defined by unique parameters.

Note 2:
The term “soul” is a classical expression referring to what we define as the second dimension of matter, namely the quantum magnetic field of matter. We have provided detailed definitions and the conceptual clarification of this idea within our theoretical framework.

Note 3:
Every phenomenon and entity in the universe is alive, dynamic, and possesses its own form of consciousness, which is in a constant state of expansion. The concept of “death”, in this context, is nothing more than transformation. Therefore, it is not only appropriate but necessary to examine every component and being in the universe as a living, conscious unit.

Note 4:
No entity in the universe will ever regress to a level of consciousness lower than the one it currently possesses. The movement is always upward—from lower to higher states. However, in the case of the human species, this trajectory can, under certain circumstances, follow a slightly different pattern.

Note 5:
All units of existence in the universe, despite their varying forms, share a common overarching purpose:

to attract benefit, to repel harm, and—through the interplay of these two mechanisms—to ensure the continuation of their own survival.

Note 6:

The struggle for survival is a driving force that propels every unit of existence toward a more stable state. This progression constitutes a localized process of perfection, which ultimately aims at achieving the final or ultimate state of perfection for that given unit.

Note 7:

The magnetic fields—that is, the quantum dimension—of any material entity, once they have acquired all the information accessible at that specific level, will sever their connection with the material dimension and liberate themselves from its confinement. This separation is the primary reason for the subsequent decomposition of the material dimension.

Note 8:

When the internal dynamics of a unit of existence become so subtle that changes occur only at the level of minimal excitations, the discussion no longer pertains to the material aspect of that entity. At that point, we have entered the non-material, quantum dimension of the phenomenon. Throughout the present research paper, whenever the term “quantum state” is used, it specifically refers to this condition as described above.

Note 9:

In this scientific study, a specific stage of the transformation process within the mineral phase has been examined. It is important to note that the terms “creative quantum cloud,” “quantum cloud,” or “magnetic field” are used to describe the classical concept of the soul.

To better understand this concept, please refer to the following graphic:

Life in space

The question is:

Reincarnation or ascending method?

 The seven factors of creation

Intelligence network

Master Elahi's Prophecies

Laws of creation

Laws of creation